Because of its dirty politics, the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group is suffering in Europe. Britain has declared, "You have no place in our society." France says the group threatens national cohesion.

 

the Muslim Brotherhood 

Because of its dirty politics, the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group is suffering in Europe. Britain has declared, "You have no place in our society." France says the group threatens national cohesion. A Telegraph writer says they exploit their identity to serve a racist agenda.

The terrorist Muslim Brotherhood group abroad suffers from societal rejection in European countries due to its dirty policies, which call for inciting strife, falsifying facts, and harming societies. However, some European capitals have exposed these Brotherhood schemes and reject its presence or integration into the social fabric.

In Britain, David Martin-Abrahams, former vice president of the Royal United Services Institute for Security, highlighted the rejection of the  Muslim Brotherhood's ideas  within British society in an article in the British newspaper "The Telegraph" entitled "There is no place for the Brotherhood in British society." He said that the Brotherhood does not represent British Muslims, but rather exploits their identity to serve a racist agenda.

He added that the Muslim Brotherhood  is not merely a theological school of thought, nor a minor current within the broad Islamic heritage, but rather a deliberate and well-organized transnational political project that uses the democratic process to undermine democratic standards, noting that "the group displays moderation in public while advocating ideological rigidity behind closed doors.Its agents are shrewd, eloquent, and adept at concealing extremism behind the language of human rights."

He continued: “  The Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t win  by force, but by stealth: attending government meetings, winning grants, dominating community organizations, and inserting itself into institutions as the supposed voice of Muslim Britain. It doesn’t call for jihad in the streets; instead, it whispers about  Islamophobia  in council meetings while demonizing Muslims who oppose its rule. It’s a soft coup against identity, replacing pluralism with obedience and religion with ideology.”

The author argues that the British state confuses access with authenticity. In its pursuit of "social cohesion," it has granted influence to those least representative of the diversity within Muslim communities. Local authorities, government departments, and academic institutions regularly provide platforms for figures linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, mistakenly equating their organizational presence with popular legitimacy. The result is the marginalization of moderate Muslim voices that do not share the Brotherhood's worldview and lack the mechanisms to challenge it.

He added that the consequences are dire, arguing that  British Muslims  today are caught in a vice: on one hand, they are targeted by Islamophobia, and on the other, they are stifled by self-appointed guardians of Islam who consider dissenters traitors. The Muslim Brotherhood has created a political environment where Islamic identity is defined not by faith, but by allegiance to a cause. Often, its fiercest opponents are Muslims themselves, but their resistance is dismissed as false or completely ignored.

The author added that this conflation of Islam and Islamism is not only inaccurate but also dangerous. It perpetuates the myth that being Muslim in Britain equates to supporting a reactionary ideology and fuels division by marginalizing moderate Muslims. He emphasized that we must stop treating ideological actors as cultural representatives. True integration means engaging with Muslims as citizens, not as agents of political Islam.

The 2015 British government review of the Muslim Brotherhood , commissioned by then-Prime Minister David Cameron, concluded  that the group was clandestine and operated with a double standard—moderate in public, extremist in private. It warned that the Brotherhood’s ideology and network posed a potential threat to democratic values. However, nearly a decade later, the report remains suppressed, while the group continues to entrench itself within civil society.

He stressed that to protect British Muslims, we must do more than simply condemn hatred against them; we must also confront the forces that seek to control their lives from within. This is not oppression, it is liberation: a refusal to allow theocratic ideologues to masquerade as spokespeople for an entire religion.
He concluded his article by saying that silence is not the price of tolerance, but rather moral clarity. The UK must reject the illusion that Islamist movements represent Islamic identity. Only then can we ensure that British Muslims are not caught between the hammer of intolerance and the anvil of Islamist hegemony.

In France, the French news agency AFP reported that a report scheduled to be presented to  French President Emmanuel Macron next Wednesday confirms that the Muslim Brotherhood poses a "threat to national cohesion" in France and calls for measures to curb the spread of "political Islam".
The report published by the agency stated that the reality of this threat, even if it is long-term and does not involve acts of violence, poses a danger to the fabric of society and republican institutions... and more broadly to national cohesion.

The Defense Council is scheduled to consider on Wednesday the report prepared by two senior civil servants. France and Germany have the largest Muslim populations among EU countries.
The report noted the spread of this movement from the bottom up and at the municipal level, adding that this phenomenon constitutes a “short- to medium-term threat,” adding: “It seems necessary to take firm and long-term measures on the ground to stop the rise of what they called ‘political Islam’.”

The report highlighted the “subversive nature of the project,” saying it aimed to “bring about gradual changes to local or national rules,” particularly those relating to secularism and gender equality.
French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau has expressed concern about a “low-level Islamism” whose “ultimate goal is to transform French society.”

The report added that the Muslim Brotherhood is losing influence in the Arab world and focusing its efforts on Europe, adding: “A public awareness campaign should be coupled with renewed efforts to promote a ‘secular discourse’ as well as ‘strong and positive signals to the Muslim community,’ including Arabic language education.”