Scientists capture the clearest evidence of extraterrestrial life... What did they see?

 

aliens

Scientists capture the clearest evidence of extraterrestrial life... What did they see?

Space and astronomy experts have been able to detect the most conclusive evidence and the most obvious traces of the existence of extraterrestrial beings in the universe, beings that most likely have not been able to reach us, just as we humans have not been able to communicate with them.

A report published by the specialized website Science Alert, and reviewed stated that a detailed survey conducted by a giant telescope revealed these effects on the comet named (3I/ATLAS), which had previously puzzled scientists.

The Breakthrough Listen project used one of the world's largest and most sensitive radio telescopes, the 100-meter Green Bank Telescope, to listen for several hours to the comet about a day before it reached its closest point to Earth on December 19, 2025.

The team searched for artificial technological signatures across a wide range of radio frequencies, and although many signals were detected, none of them were found to have originated from the comet, which means they may be traces of something else, and that something may be extraterrestrial beings. In fact, scientists say they are the clearest evidence of the existence of beings other than us in this universe.

Comet 3I/ATLAS was discovered on July 1, 2025, and calculations of its trajectory revealed that it originated from outside the solar system. In late October of that year, the comet reached its closest point to the Sun, known as perihelion, and then, approximately two months later, reached its closest point to Earth, known as perihelion, during its return to interstellar space.

The comet reached a distance of approximately 270 million kilometers at perihelion, which is roughly double the distance between the Earth and the Sun, which is 150 million kilometers, but it is still close enough to make some detailed observations.

On December 18, a team led by astronomer Ben Jacobson-Bell from the University of California, Berkeley deployed the Green Bank Telescope to listen to the comet for five hours.
If the comet had sent out a radio signal of the type the search was designed to detect during that period, the Green Bank Telescope would have picked it up.

To ensure that the signals picked up by the telescope were coming from the comet, observations alternated between pointing the telescope at the comet and observing other areas of the sky in an expanding fractional pattern known as the ABACAD order, with the switch occurring every five minutes.

After ruling out signals from other parts of the sky, researchers were left with nine potential radio signals. More precise observations revealed that these nine signals originated from technology; they were likely simply radio frequency interference from human-made technology on and around Earth.
But scientists said this does not definitively rule out the possibility that the comet contains extraterrestrial technology, meaning there is still a strong possibility that what was captured is evidence of extraterrestrial life.

NASA Associate Administrator Amit Kshatraya said last November: "This object is a comet. It appears to be behaving like a comet, and all the evidence points to it being one. But this particular comet came from outside the solar system, which makes it interesting, exciting, and of great scientific interest."

He adds: "So why search if we know we're unlikely to find anything? Because searching is the essence of science. Even not finding something tells us something. In this case, the absence at least tells us that this comet is not a space beacon sent to broadcast a radio frequency message across the solar system."

"These discussions give non-experts an idea of ​​the kinds of amazing observations that are being made, the pleasure scientists get when they think about them, and the possibilities that are available," said physicist Paul Ginsberg of Cornell University, founder of the arXiv website.

He added: "Sometimes wild speculations can benefit the next generation of devices, which in turn can either confirm or refute the wild hypothesis, or discover something else entirely and unexpected. This is also what makes science interesting."